Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Reddick v. Martin, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Marcus Reddick's appeal of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. In a per curiam opinion, the circuit court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the petition. The circuit court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-07-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7280

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Marcus Reddick's appeal of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. In a per curiam opinion, the circuit court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the petition. The circuit court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Reddick v. Martin, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Marcus Reddick's appeal of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. In a per curiam opinion, the circuit court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the petition. The circuit court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7280

    MARCUS REDDICK,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    TOM C. MARTIN,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
    (CA-97-497-5-F)

    Submitted:

    July 22, 1998

    Decided:

    July 31, 1998

    Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Marcus Reddick, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district courts order denying relief on
    his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.
    1998). We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
    and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Reddick v. Martin, No. CA-97-497-5-F (E.D.N.C. July
    28, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like