Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Yolanda Sheree Chapman v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail Jack Dewan, 69 F.3d 532, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Yolanda Sheree Chapman filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Western Tidewater Regional Jail and Jack Dewan. The district court denied relief on Chapman's complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-10-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 69 F.3d 532 Docket: 95-7049

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Yolanda Sheree Chapman filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Western Tidewater Regional Jail and Jack Dewan. The district court denied relief on Chapman's complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views1 page

    Yolanda Sheree Chapman v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail Jack Dewan, 69 F.3d 532, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Yolanda Sheree Chapman filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Western Tidewater Regional Jail and Jack Dewan. The district court denied relief on Chapman's complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    69 F.

    3d 532

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Yolanda Sheree CHAPMAN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    WESTERN TIDEWATER REGIONAL JAIL; Jack Dewan,
    Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 95-7049.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Oct. 25, 1995.

    Yolanda Sheree Chapman, Appellant Pro Se.


    Rebecca Lynn Deloria, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, Norfolk, Virginia, for
    Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Chapman v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail,
    No. CA-94-472-2 (E.D. Va. June 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like