Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lord Versatile v. Loretta Kelly, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    1) Lord Versatile, a Virginia inmate, appealed a district court order that accepted a magistrate judge's recommendation and denied relief on Versatile's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. 2) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Versatile for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-02-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-7587

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Lord Versatile, a Virginia inmate, appealed a district court order that accepted a magistrate judge's recommendation and denied relief on Versatile's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. 2) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Versatile for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Lord Versatile v. Loretta Kelly, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Lord Versatile, a Virginia inmate, appealed a district court order that accepted a magistrate judge's recommendation and denied relief on Versatile's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. 2) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Versatile for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-7587

    LORD VERSATILE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    LORETTA KELLY, Warden (Former), Sussex I State Prison; A. F.
    MILLER, Operations Officer, Warden - Designee, Sussex I
    State Prison; R. W. SPROUSE, CO, Investigator, Sussex I
    State Prison; W. BROWN, Hearings Officer, Sussex I State
    Prison,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:12-cv-00333-HEH)

    Submitted:

    February 20, 2014

    Decided:

    February 25, 2014

    Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lord Versatile, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lord
    district
    magistrate
    (2006)

    Versatile,

    courts
    judge

    complaint.

    reversible error.

    order
    and

    Virginia

    accepting

    denying

    We

    have

    the

    relief
    reviewed

    inmate,

    appeals

    recommendation

    on

    his

    the

    42

    record

    of

    U.S.C.
    and

    the
    the

    1983

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    Versatile v. Kelly, No. 3:12-cv-00333-

    HEH (E.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2013).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like