Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Chander Kant v. Jay Cohen, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order taxing costs against Chander Kant and Ashima K. Kant. The Kants appealed the clerk's order taxing costs from a previous case against Jay L. Cohen. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-03-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-1844

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order taxing costs against Chander Kant and Ashima K. Kant. The Kants appealed the clerk's order taxing costs from a previous case against Jay L. Cohen. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Chander Kant v. Jay Cohen, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order taxing costs against Chander Kant and Ashima K. Kant. The Kants appealed the clerk's order taxing costs from a previous case against Jay L. Cohen. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-1844

    CHANDER KANT; ASHIMA K. KANT,


    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    v.
    JAY L. COHEN,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:08cv-00318-RWT)

    Submitted:

    January 6, 2012

    Decided:

    March 8, 2012

    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Chander Kant, Ashima K. Kant, Appellants Pro Se.


    Appellee Pro Se.

    Jay L. Cohen,

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Chander Kant and Ashima K. Kant appeal the district
    courts order affirming the clerks order taxing costs.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See

    Kant

    11,

    v.

    Cohen,

    No.

    8:08-cv-00318-RWT

    2011; entered July 12, 2011).

    (D.

    Md.

    filed

    July

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like