Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hurst v. TRW, Incorporated, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Jerry Hurst appealed a district court's orders granting summary judgment to TRW Inc. and denying Hurst's requested relief in a case against his former employer. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings that TRW was entitled to summary judgment and that Hurst was not entitled to the relief sought. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-06-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-2298

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jerry Hurst appealed a district court's orders granting summary judgment to TRW Inc. and denying Hurst's requested relief in a case against his former employer. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings that TRW was entitled to summary judgment and that Hurst was not entitled to the relief sought. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Hurst v. TRW, Incorporated, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jerry Hurst appealed a district court's orders granting summary judgment to TRW Inc. and denying Hurst's requested relief in a case against his former employer. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings that TRW was entitled to summary judgment and that Hurst was not entitled to the relief sought. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-2298

    JERRY A. HURST,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    TRW, INCORPORATED,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
    Judge. (CA-02-1479-A)

    Submitted:

    May 26, 2004

    Decided:

    June 17, 2004

    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jerry A. Hurst, Appellant Pro Se. Carson Hobbs


    MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Sullivan,

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jerry
    awarding
    requested

    A.

    Hurst

    summary

    appeals

    judgment

    relief.

    We

    to

    have

    the

    district

    Defendant

    reviewed

    the

    and

    courts
    denying

    record

    and

    orders
    Hursts
    find

    no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court. See Hurst v. TRW, Inc., No. CA-02-1479-A (E.D.
    Va. Apr. 4, 2003; filed May 22, 2003 & entered May 23, 2003; filed
    July 28, 2003 & entered July 29, 2003; filed Aug. 18, 2003 &
    entered Aug. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like