Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Carl Jefferson, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Carl Jefferson appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny Jefferson's motion for a reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-06-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6408

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Carl Jefferson appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny Jefferson's motion for a reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Carl Jefferson, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Carl Jefferson appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny Jefferson's motion for a reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6408

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CARL ARMSTEAD JEFFERSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:10-cr-00221-HEH-1)

    Submitted:

    June 26, 2014

    Decided:

    June 30, 2014

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Carl Armstead Jefferson, Appellant Pro Se.


    Michael Arlen
    Jagels, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond,
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Carl Armstead Jefferson appeals the district courts
    order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence
    pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2012).
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Jefferson, No. 3:10cr00221-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2014).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like