Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Fulgham v. Honeycutt, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    1) Joe Lee Fulgham appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Cathy Davis Honeycutt, a Suffolk VA probation officer. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit denied Fulgham's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasons provided by the district court in its March 2, 2009 order denying relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-08-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6607

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Joe Lee Fulgham appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Cathy Davis Honeycutt, a Suffolk VA probation officer. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit denied Fulgham's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasons provided by the district court in its March 2, 2009 order denying relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Fulgham v. Honeycutt, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Joe Lee Fulgham appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Cathy Davis Honeycutt, a Suffolk VA probation officer. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit denied Fulgham's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasons provided by the district court in its March 2, 2009 order denying relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6607

    JOE LEE FULGHAM,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CATHY DAVIS HONEYCUTT, a Suffolk Va. Probation Officer,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (2:09-CV-00086-JBF-JEB)

    Submitted:

    August 20, 2009

    Before WILKINSON and


    Senior Circuit Judge.

    MICHAEL,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    August 27, 2009

    and

    HAMILTON,

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Joe Lee Fulgham, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Joe Lee Fulgham seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    Accordingly,

    we

    the

    deny

    record
    leave

    and

    to

    find

    proceed

    no
    in

    reversible
    forma

    error.

    pauperis

    and

    dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
    Fulgham

    v.

    Honeycutt,

    Mar. 2, 2009).

    No.

    2:09-CV-00086-JBF-JEB

    (E.D.

    Va.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional

    process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like