Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Fulgham v. Delk, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Joe Lee Fulgham in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against a Virginia circuit court judge and the Virginia State Police Sexual Offender Registry. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court adopted the district court's reasons for affirming and dispensed with oral argument, concluding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-11-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7235

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Joe Lee Fulgham in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against a Virginia circuit court judge and the Virginia State Police Sexual Offender Registry. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court adopted the district court's reasons for affirming and dispensed with oral argument, concluding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views2 pages

    Fulgham v. Delk, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Joe Lee Fulgham in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against a Virginia circuit court judge and the Virginia State Police Sexual Offender Registry. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court adopted the district court's reasons for affirming and dispensed with oral argument, concluding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7235

    JOE LEE FULGHAM,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JASON DELK, Suffolk Virginia Circuit Court
    Judge; VIRGINIA STATE POLICE SEXUAL OFFENDER
    REGISTER, Virginia State Police Department,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (CA-05-414)

    Submitted:

    November 17, 2005

    Decided:

    November 29, 2005

    Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Joe Lee Fulgham, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Joe

    Lee

    Fulgham

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    order

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    district

    court.

    Fulgham v. Delk, No. CA-05-414 (E.D. Va. July 20, 2005).

    See
    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like