Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Fulgham v. Parker, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Joe Lee Fulgham appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three judges. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials, the Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-07-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6733

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Joe Lee Fulgham appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three judges. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials, the Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Fulgham v. Parker, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Joe Lee Fulgham appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three judges. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials, the Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6733

    JOE LEE FULGHAM,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WESTBROOK J. PARKER, Honorable Judge; JUDGE,
    ???; JUDGE, ???,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (2:05-cv-00401-JBF)

    Submitted: July 20, 2006

    Decided: July 28, 2006

    Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Joe Lee Fulgham, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Joe

    Lee

    Fulgham

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his 42


    U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    find no reversible error.
    stated

    by

    the

    district

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons


    court.

    Fulgham

    v.

    Parker,

    No.

    2:05-cv-00401-JBF (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 24, 2006 & entered Feb. 27,
    2006).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like