Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ivan Mendez v. Unknown, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document summarizes an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court dismissed an appeal from Ivan L. Mendez of a district court ruling dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons stated by the district court in its August 31, 2012 ruling. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-12-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7706

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court dismissed an appeal from Ivan L. Mendez of a district court ruling dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons stated by the district court in its August 31, 2012 ruling. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Ivan Mendez v. Unknown, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court dismissed an appeal from Ivan L. Mendez of a district court ruling dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons stated by the district court in its August 31, 2012 ruling. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7706

    IVAN L. MENDEZ,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    UNKNOWN,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Leonie M. Brinkema,
    District Judge. (1:12-cv-00917-LMB-TRJ)

    Submitted:

    December 20, 2012

    Decided:

    December 27, 2012

    Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ivan L. Mendez, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ivan

    L.

    Mendez

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.


    1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
    that

    this

    appeal

    is

    We have reviewed the record and find

    frivolous.

    Accordingly,

    we

    dismiss

    appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Mendez v.

    Unknown, No. 1:12-cv-00917-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. Aug. 31, 2012).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    the

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like