Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Williams v. Officer Vinson, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Brandon Williams filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three defendants (Officer Vinson, D.S. Story, and Sergeant Dole) which was dismissed by the district court for failure to state a claim. Williams appealed this decision. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-03-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-8409

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Brandon Williams filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three defendants (Officer Vinson, D.S. Story, and Sergeant Dole) which was dismissed by the district court for failure to state a claim. Williams appealed this decision. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Williams v. Officer Vinson, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Brandon Williams filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three defendants (Officer Vinson, D.S. Story, and Sergeant Dole) which was dismissed by the district court for failure to state a claim. Williams appealed this decision. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-8409

    BRANDON WILLIAMS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    OFFICER VINSON; D.S. STORY, Supervisor; SERGEANT DOLE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Leonie M. Brinkema,
    District Judge. (1:08-cv-00851-LMB-TCB)

    Submitted:

    March 12, 2009

    Before MOTZ and


    Circuit Judge.

    SHEDD,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    March 17, 2009

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Brandon Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Brandon

    Williams

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to


    state

    claim.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by

    court.

    the

    district

    Williams

    v.

    Officer

    Vinson,

    No.

    1:08-cv-00851-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 22, 2008 & entered


    Oct. 27, 2008).
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like