Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Badruddoza v. The U.S. Law Enforcement Units, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Abu Alliah Mohammed Badruddoza appealed a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against U.S. law enforcement units and the Alexandria Police Department. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling that denied relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-04-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-2204

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Abu Alliah Mohammed Badruddoza appealed a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against U.S. law enforcement units and the Alexandria Police Department. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling that denied relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Badruddoza v. The U.S. Law Enforcement Units, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Abu Alliah Mohammed Badruddoza appealed a district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against U.S. law enforcement units and the Alexandria Police Department. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling that denied relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-2204

    ABU ALLIAH MOHAMMED BADRUDDOZA,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    THE UNITED STATES LAW ENFORCEMENT UNITS
    DEPARTMENTS; ALEXANDRIA POLICE DEPARTMENT,

    THE

    POLICE

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
    Judge. (1:07-cv-01074-LMB-BRP)

    Submitted:

    March 27, 2008

    Decided:

    April 1, 2008

    Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Abu Alliah Mohammed Badruddoza, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Abu

    Alliah

    Mohammed

    Badruddoza

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000)


    complaint.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    Badruddoza v. U.S. Law Enforcement Units, No.

    1:07-cv-01074-LMB-BRP (E.D. Va. Oct. 31, 2007).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like