Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Terence Lockett, Sr. v. Earnest Toney, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Terence Linwood Lockett, Sr.'s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failing to pay the initial partial filing fee. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It also determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-11-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-7582

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Terence Linwood Lockett, Sr.'s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failing to pay the initial partial filing fee. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It also determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Terence Lockett, Sr. v. Earnest Toney, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Terence Linwood Lockett, Sr.'s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failing to pay the initial partial filing fee. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It also determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-7582

    TERENCE LINWOOD LOCKETT, SR.,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    EARNEST TONEY; WESLEY REED; JAMES ENNIS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    John A. Gibney, Jr.,
    District Judge. (3:13-cv-00209-JAG)

    Submitted:

    November 21, 2013

    Decided:

    November 26, 2013

    Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Terence Linwood Lockett, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Terence
    courts

    order

    Linwood

    dismissing

    Lockett,
    his

    42

    Sr.,
    U.S.C.

    appeals
    1983

    the

    district

    (2006)

    action

    without prejudice for failing to pay the initial partial filing


    fee.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Lockett

    v.

    Sept. 19, 2013).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    Toney,

    No.

    3:13-cv-00209-JAG

    (E.D.

    Va.

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like