Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lunsford v. Powell, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Rodney Lunsford filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants that was denied by the district court. Lunsford appealed the denial to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's denial of relief for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-11-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-6310

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Rodney Lunsford filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants that was denied by the district court. Lunsford appealed the denial to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's denial of relief for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Lunsford v. Powell, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Rodney Lunsford filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants that was denied by the district court. Lunsford appealed the denial to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's denial of relief for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-6310

    RODNEY M. LUNSFORD,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SCOTT WADE POWELL; SERGEANT SCOTT,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-02-490-5-BO)

    Submitted:

    November 6, 2003

    Decided:

    November 17, 2003

    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Rodney M. Lunsford, Appellant Pro Se. Mary S. Mercer, Assistant


    Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Rodney M. Lunsford appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.

    We have reviewed

    the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for


    the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Lunsford v. Powell,

    No. CA-02-490-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral


    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like