Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McDonald v. Warden, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal by Paul McDonald of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its April 2, 2009 opinion. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the court and additional argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-12-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7148

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal by Paul McDonald of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its April 2, 2009 opinion. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the court and additional argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    McDonald v. Warden, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal by Paul McDonald of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its April 2, 2009 opinion. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the court and additional argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7148

    PAUL MCDONALD,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
    Judge. (8:08-cv-03503-PJM)

    Submitted:

    November 19, 2009

    Decided:

    December 2, 2009

    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Paul McDonald, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Paul

    McDonald

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    McDonald

    April 2,

    2009).

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    v.
    We

    Warden,

    No.

    dispense

    with

    contentions
    the

    court

    8:08-cv-03503-PJM
    oral

    argument

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    (D.

    Md.

    because

    the

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like