Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Furtado v. Manger, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Edson Furtado filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against Thomas Manger which was dismissed without prejudice by the district court. Furtado appealed the dismissal. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal. The appeals court also denied Furtado's motion for appointment of counsel. Unpublished opinions from the appeals court are not binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-08-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6265

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Edson Furtado filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against Thomas Manger which was dismissed without prejudice by the district court. Furtado appealed the dismissal. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal. The appeals court also denied Furtado's motion for appointment of counsel. Unpublished opinions from the appeals court are not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Furtado v. Manger, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Edson Furtado filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against Thomas Manger which was dismissed without prejudice by the district court. Furtado appealed the dismissal. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal. The appeals court also denied Furtado's motion for appointment of counsel. Unpublished opinions from the appeals court are not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6265

    EDSON FURTADO,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    THOMAS MANGER, Chief,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv03403-RWT)

    Submitted:

    August 21, 2008

    Decided:

    August 26, 2008

    Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Edson

    Furtado

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Furtado v. Manger, No. 8:07-cv-03403-RWT (D. Md. Feb. 1,

    2008).

    Furtados motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like