Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Dewayne Anthony v. Albert Kuhne, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Dewayne Lee Anthony's § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-07-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-6012

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Dewayne Lee Anthony's § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Dewayne Anthony v. Albert Kuhne, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Dewayne Lee Anthony's § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-6012

    DEWAYNE LEE ANTHONY,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    ALBERT
    KEITH
    KUHNE,
    MD
    Doctor,
    Institution; SUSAN MCNEELY, R.N.,
    Institution,

    Marion
    Marion

    Correctional
    Correctional

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Asheville.
    Robert J. Conrad,
    Jr., District Judge. (1:12-cv-00387-RJC)

    Submitted:

    June 25, 2013

    Decided:

    July 17, 2013

    Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Dewayne Lee Anthony, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Dewayne Lee Anthony appeals the district courts order
    dismissing

    his

    complaint

    under

    failure to state a claim.


    no reversible error.
    stated

    by

    the

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    argument

    adequately

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    district

    because

    presented

    for

    We have reviewed the record and find

    court.

    Anthony

    1:12-cv-00387-RJC (W.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2012).


    oral

    (2006)

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    v.

    Khune,

    No.

    We dispense with
    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like