Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Vandivere v. Stansberry, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    James Dow Vandivere, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denial of his Rule 59(e) motion. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings for the reasons stated. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-09-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6615

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    James Dow Vandivere, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denial of his Rule 59(e) motion. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings for the reasons stated. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Vandivere v. Stansberry, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    James Dow Vandivere, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denial of his Rule 59(e) motion. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings for the reasons stated. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6615

    JAMES DOW VANDIVERE,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden of FCC Petersburg Medium,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (2:09-cv-00037-JBF-TEM)

    Submitted:

    August 26, 2009

    Before TRAXLER,
    Judges.

    Chief

    Judge,

    Decided: September 2, 2009

    and

    GREGORY

    and

    SHEDD,

    Circuit

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James Dow Vandivere, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    James Dow Vandivere, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district courts order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241
    (2006) petition and the district courts order denying his Fed.
    R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.
    no reversible error.
    stated

    by

    the

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    district

    court.

    Vandivere

    v.

    Stansberry,

    No. 2:09-cv-00037-JBF-TEM, (E.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2009 & March 16,


    2009).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like