Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Messick, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Nathan Messick appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling. Additionally, the appeals court denied Messick's request to have transcripts prepared at government expense, finding oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clear from the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-11-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7426

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Nathan Messick appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling. Additionally, the appeals court denied Messick's request to have transcripts prepared at government expense, finding oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clear from the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Messick, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Nathan Messick appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling. Additionally, the appeals court denied Messick's request to have transcripts prepared at government expense, finding oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clear from the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7426

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    NATHAN MESSICK,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
    Chief District Judge. (3:06-cr-00058-JPB-1)

    Submitted:

    November 17, 2009

    Decided:

    November 24, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Nathan Messick, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia;
    Michael Stein, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Nathan

    Messick

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence


    reduction.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district

    court.

    United

    States

    v.

    3:06-cr-00058-JBP-1 (N.D. W. Va. July 21, 2009).


    Messicks
    dispense

    motion
    with

    for

    oral

    transcripts
    argument

    at

    because

    We also deny

    government
    the

    No.

    Messick,

    facts

    expense
    and

    and
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like