Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Jacobs, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Mark Anthony Jacobs appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. Per curiam, the appellate court determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the lower court's ruling and oral arguments would not aid their decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jacobs' motion to reduce his sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-05-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6090

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Mark Anthony Jacobs appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. Per curiam, the appellate court determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the lower court's ruling and oral arguments would not aid their decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jacobs' motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Jacobs, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Mark Anthony Jacobs appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. Per curiam, the appellate court determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the lower court's ruling and oral arguments would not aid their decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jacobs' motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6090

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MARK ANTHONY JACOBS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
    Chief District Judge. (2:97-cr-00136-WLO-1)

    Submitted:

    May 21, 2009

    Decided:

    May 29, 2009

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Mark Anthony Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton,


    Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys,
    Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Mark Anthony Jacobs appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
    U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and find

    no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

    the district court.

    United States v. Jacobs, No. 2:97-cr-00136-

    WLO-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 2008).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like