Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Locklear v. Stancil, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is a court ruling dismissing an appeal from Timmie Russell Locklear, a North Carolina prisoner. The district court had denied relief on Locklear's §1983 civil rights complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Locklear's appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the district court's reasoning. The appeals court further denied Locklear's motions for discovery, to amend his complaint, for counsel, and for production of documents. The court ruled without oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-09-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6748

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court ruling dismissing an appeal from Timmie Russell Locklear, a North Carolina prisoner. The district court had denied relief on Locklear's §1983 civil rights complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Locklear's appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the district court's reasoning. The appeals court further denied Locklear's motions for discovery, to amend his complaint, for counsel, and for production of documents. The court ruled without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Locklear v. Stancil, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling dismissing an appeal from Timmie Russell Locklear, a North Carolina prisoner. The district court had denied relief on Locklear's §1983 civil rights complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Locklear's appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the district court's reasoning. The appeals court further denied Locklear's motions for discovery, to amend his complaint, for counsel, and for production of documents. The court ruled without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6748

    TIMMIE RUSSELL LOCKLEAR,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    LINWOOD STANCIL; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
    CORRECTION,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-01-195-5-F)

    Submitted:

    September 20, 2001

    Decided:

    September 26, 2001

    Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Timmie Russell Locklear, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Timmie Russell Locklear, a North Carolina prisoner, appeals
    the district courts order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983
    (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. 1915A (West Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we

    dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See

    Locklear v. Stancil, No. CA-01-195-5-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2001).


    We further deny Locklears motion for discovery, his motion to
    amend, his motion for counsel and his motion for production of
    documents.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like