Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Turner v. Augusta County Circuit Court, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed John Paul Turner's appeal of a district court's ruling that dismissed his civil action and denied his motion for reconsideration. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Turner's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons provided by the district court in its orders. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-03-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-1008

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed John Paul Turner's appeal of a district court's ruling that dismissed his civil action and denied his motion for reconsideration. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Turner's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons provided by the district court in its orders. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Turner v. Augusta County Circuit Court, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed John Paul Turner's appeal of a district court's ruling that dismissed his civil action and denied his motion for reconsideration. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Turner's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons provided by the district court in its orders. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-1008

    JOHN PAUL TURNER,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    AUGUSTA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; CHURCHVILLE FIREHOUSE VOTING
    POLL; CITY OF STAUNTON; ADJUTANT GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Samuel G. Wilson, District
    Judge. (7:07-cv-000530-SGW)

    Submitted:

    February 20, 2008

    Decided:

    March 6, 2008

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    John Paul Turner appeals the district courts orders
    dismissing his civil action under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000)
    and denying his motion for reconsideration.

    We have reviewed the

    record and find that this appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we

    dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
    Turner v. Augusta County Circuit Court, No. 7:07-cv-00530-SGW (W.D.
    Va. Oct. 31, 2007; Nov. 27, 2007).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like