Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Turner V., 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    John Paul Turner appealed a district court order dismissing his mandamus petition for failure to comply with a prefiling injunction. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Turner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the appeal for the reasons provided by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-01-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-1941

    Original Title

    In Re: Turner v., 4th Cir. (2007)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    John Paul Turner appealed a district court order dismissing his mandamus petition for failure to comply with a prefiling injunction. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Turner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the appeal for the reasons provided by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    In Re: Turner V., 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John Paul Turner appealed a district court order dismissing his mandamus petition for failure to comply with a prefiling injunction. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Turner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the appeal for the reasons provided by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-1941

    In Re:

    JOHN PAUL TURNER,


    Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Samuel G. Wilson, District
    Judge. (7:06-mc-00026-SGW)

    Submitted:

    December 13, 2006

    Decided:

    January 10, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    John Paul Turner appeals the district courts order
    dismissing Turners mandamus petition for failure to comply with a
    prefiling injunction.
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we deny the motion for leave to

    proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons
    stated by the district court. In Re: Turner, No. 7:06-mc-00026-SGW
    (W.D. Va. May 17, 2006).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like