Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Turner v. Commonwealth of VA, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed John Paul Turner's appeal of a district court's orders dismissing his action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying his motion for reconsideration. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It denied Turner's motion to appeal in forma pauperis and dismissed the appeal, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without need for oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-04-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-2361

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed John Paul Turner's appeal of a district court's orders dismissing his action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying his motion for reconsideration. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It denied Turner's motion to appeal in forma pauperis and dismissed the appeal, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without need for oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Turner v. Commonwealth of VA, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed John Paul Turner's appeal of a district court's orders dismissing his action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying his motion for reconsideration. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It denied Turner's motion to appeal in forma pauperis and dismissed the appeal, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without need for oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-2361

    JOHN PAUL TURNER, a/k/a Pops,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Samuel G. Wilson, District
    Judge. (CA-05-45-SGW)

    Submitted:

    April 3, 2006

    Decided:

    April 25, 2006

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    John Paul Turner appeals the district courts orders
    dismissing this action for want of subject matter jurisdiction and
    denying the motion for reconsideration.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we deny the

    motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis and dismiss the


    appeal.

    See Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp., 544

    U.S. 280, 125 S. Ct. 1517, 1521-22, 1527 (2005); Davani v. Va.
    Dept Transp., 434 F.3d 712, 719 (4th Cir. 2006).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like