Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lebedun v. Baskerville, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Allen Lebedun appealed the district court's denial of his §2254 petition to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As a result, the Fourth Circuit denied Lebedun's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the §2254 petition. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-04-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6109

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Allen Lebedun appealed the district court's denial of his §2254 petition to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As a result, the Fourth Circuit denied Lebedun's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the §2254 petition. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Lebedun v. Baskerville, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Allen Lebedun appealed the district court's denial of his §2254 petition to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As a result, the Fourth Circuit denied Lebedun's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the §2254 petition. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6109

    ALLEN LEBEDUN,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-01-683-AM)

    Submitted:

    April 18, 2002

    Decided:

    April 26, 2002

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Allen Lebedun, Appellant Pro Se. Hazel Elizabeth Shaffer, Assistant
    Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Allen Lebedun seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West
    1994 & Supp. 2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court.

    See Lebedun v. Baskerville, No.

    CA-01-683-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 27, 2001).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like