Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Job Pepe v. John B. Taylor, Warden F. S. Robinson, 966 F.2d 1443, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 11, 1992. It involves a plaintiff, Job Pepe, appealing the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by a magistrate judge. The three-judge panel affirmed the magistrate judge's decision, finding the appeal lacked merit based on the reasoning provided in the lower court ruling. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal arguments were already adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-06-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 966 F.2d 1443 Docket: 92-6254

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 11, 1992. It involves a plaintiff, Job Pepe, appealing the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by a magistrate judge. The three-judge panel affirmed the magistrate judge's decision, finding the appeal lacked merit based on the reasoning provided in the lower court ruling. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal arguments were already adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Job Pepe v. John B. Taylor, Warden F. S. Robinson, 966 F.2d 1443, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 11, 1992. It involves a plaintiff, Job Pepe, appealing the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by a magistrate judge. The three-judge panel affirmed the magistrate judge's decision, finding the appeal lacked merit based on the reasoning provided in the lower court ruling. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal arguments were already adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    966 F.

    2d 1443

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Job PEPE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    John B. TAYLOR, Warden; F. S. Robinson, DefendantsAppellees.
    No. 92-6254.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 1, 1992
    Decided: June 11, 1992

    Job Pepe, Appellant Pro Se.


    Karen Lynn Lebo, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond,
    Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    OPINION
    1

    Job Pepe appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief under 42
    U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Pepe v. Taylor, No. CA-91-804-R (W.D.
    Va. Mar. 3, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like