Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Cupidon v. INS, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Silvie Marie Cupidon petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to review a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that found her deportable and denied her applications for asylum and suspension of deportation. The Fourth Circuit denied the petition, finding that the BIA's decision was supported by substantial evidence and without error. The court affirmed the BIA's decision and denied Cupidon's request for oral argument, determining the issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-09-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-1214

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Silvie Marie Cupidon petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to review a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that found her deportable and denied her applications for asylum and suspension of deportation. The Fourth Circuit denied the petition, finding that the BIA's decision was supported by substantial evidence and without error. The court affirmed the BIA's decision and denied Cupidon's request for oral argument, determining the issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Cupidon v. INS, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Silvie Marie Cupidon petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to review a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that found her deportable and denied her applications for asylum and suspension of deportation. The Fourth Circuit denied the petition, finding that the BIA's decision was supported by substantial evidence and without error. The court affirmed the BIA's decision and denied Cupidon's request for oral argument, determining the issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-1214

    SILVIE MARIE CUPIDON,


    Petitioner,
    versus
    U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
    Respondent.

    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration


    Appeals. (A70-508-519)
    Submitted:

    September 5, 1996

    Decided:

    September 13, 1996

    Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Silvie Marie Cupidon, Petitioner Pro Se. Richard Michael Evans,
    Donald Anthony Couvillon, Michelle Arlene Gluck, UNITED STATES
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals's
    decision and order affirming the immigration judge's decision finding the Appellant deportable, denying her applications for asylum
    and suspension of deportation, and granting her request for voluntary departure. Our review of the record discloses that the Board's
    decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition upon the reasoning
    of the Board. Cupidon v. INS, No. A70-508-519 (B.I.A. Nov. 21,
    1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like