Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tiffany v. Caldera, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Buster Tiffany's civil action challenging an unfavorable decision of the Army Decorations Board. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The district court had dismissed Tiffany's challenge to the Army Decorations Board's decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal without oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-09-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-1474

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Buster Tiffany's civil action challenging an unfavorable decision of the Army Decorations Board. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The district court had dismissed Tiffany's challenge to the Army Decorations Board's decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal without oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Tiffany v. Caldera, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Buster Tiffany's civil action challenging an unfavorable decision of the Army Decorations Board. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The district court had dismissed Tiffany's challenge to the Army Decorations Board's decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal without oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-1474

    BUSTER E. TIFFANY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    LOUIS CALDERA, Secretary of the Army, United
    States Army,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
    (CA-99-663-3)

    Submitted:

    August 30, 2000

    Decided:

    September 6, 2000

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Buster E. Tiffany, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Buster E. Tiffany appeals the district courts order dismissing his civil action challenging an unfavorable decision of the
    Army Decorations Board.

    We have reviewed the record and the dis-

    trict courts opinion and find no reversible error.


    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    Accordingly,
    See Tiffany v.

    Caldera, No. CA-99-663-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 15, 2000).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like