Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Pooler v. SuperValu Holdings, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Rajaee Pooler appealed a district court order granting summary judgment in favor of Supervalu Holdings in a case where Pooler alleged employment discrimination. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court and magistrate judge, who had found Supervalu was entitled to summary judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in existing court filings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-02-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-2097

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Rajaee Pooler appealed a district court order granting summary judgment in favor of Supervalu Holdings in a case where Pooler alleged employment discrimination. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court and magistrate judge, who had found Supervalu was entitled to summary judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in existing court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Pooler v. SuperValu Holdings, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Rajaee Pooler appealed a district court order granting summary judgment in favor of Supervalu Holdings in a case where Pooler alleged employment discrimination. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court and magistrate judge, who had found Supervalu was entitled to summary judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in existing court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-2097

    RAJAEE A. POOLER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SUPERVALU HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, District
    Judge. (CA-03-275-3)

    Submitted:

    January 28, 2005

    Decided:

    February 17, 2005

    Before WIDENER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Rajaee A. Pooler, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Garrison Meyer, III,


    Vijay Kumar Mago, LECLAIR RYAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Rajaee A. Pooler appeals the district courts order
    adopting the reasoning set forth in the magistrate judges report
    and recommendation, and granting summary judgment in favor of
    Supervalu Holdings, Inc.
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court. See Pooler v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc., No. CA-03275-3 (E.D. Va. July 23, 2004).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like