Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jerel Shaw v. Aramark Management Services, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jerel Shaw's employment discrimination complaint against Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and that oral argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-04-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-2344

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jerel Shaw's employment discrimination complaint against Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and that oral argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Jerel Shaw v. Aramark Management Services, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jerel Shaw's employment discrimination complaint against Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and that oral argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-2344

    JEREL SHAW,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    ARAMARK MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:11-cv-00483-REP)

    Submitted:

    March 28, 2013

    Decided:

    April 1, 2013

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jerel Shaw, Appellant Pro Se.


    Katherine Lee Hoekman, MORGAN
    LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jerel Shaw appeals the district courts order denying
    relief

    on

    his

    employment

    discrimination

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Shaw v.

    Aramark Mgmt. Servs. Ltd. Pship, No. 3:11-cv-00483-REP (E.D.


    Va. Oct. 19, 2012).
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like