Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Horne v. Bailey, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Anthony Horne's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three police officers. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court also denied Horne's motion for a certificate of appealability and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-01-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7018

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Anthony Horne's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three police officers. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court also denied Horne's motion for a certificate of appealability and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Horne v. Bailey, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Anthony Horne's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three police officers. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court also denied Horne's motion for a certificate of appealability and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7018

    ANTHONY W. HORNE,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    STEPHEN BAILEY, Police Officer; RICHARD M. JACKSON, Police
    Officer; DAVID M. COOPER, Police Officer,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Claude M. Hilton, Senior
    District Judge. (1:10-cv-00641-CMH-IDD)

    Submitted:

    January 13, 2011

    Decided:

    January 19, 2011

    Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony W. Horne, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony

    Horne

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    Horne v. Bailey, No. 1:10-cv-00641-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va.

    court.

    June 25, 2010).


    appealability.

    We deny Hornes motion for a certificate of


    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like