Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Paul Lee Martin v. Arnold Coffey, Captain, 14 F.3d 595, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the lower court's denial of relief to the plaintiff-appellant Paul Lee Martin in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against defendant-appellee Arnold Coffey. The Fourth Circuit found no merit to Martin's appeal after reviewing the record and lower court's opinion, so it affirmed the lower court's reasoning without needing oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1993-12-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 14 F.3d 595 Docket: 93-6962

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the lower court's denial of relief to the plaintiff-appellant Paul Lee Martin in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against defendant-appellee Arnold Coffey. The Fourth Circuit found no merit to Martin's appeal after reviewing the record and lower court's opinion, so it affirmed the lower court's reasoning without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    Paul Lee Martin v. Arnold Coffey, Captain, 14 F.3d 595, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the lower court's denial of relief to the plaintiff-appellant Paul Lee Martin in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against defendant-appellee Arnold Coffey. The Fourth Circuit found no merit to Martin's appeal after reviewing the record and lower court's opinion, so it affirmed the lower court's reasoning without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    14 F.

    3d 595

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Paul Lee MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Arnold COFFEY, Captain, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 93-6962.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Dec. 8, 1993.

    William Sampson Kerr, Appomattox, VA.


    W.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42
    U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the
    magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Martin v.
    Cox, No. CA-93-466-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 11, 1993). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like