Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Montgomery V., 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from January 2001. It affirms a district court's denial of a petition for relief from a prefiling injunction that was properly imposed on Michael Wayne Montgomery. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so the Court dispensed with oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-01-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7109

    Original Title

    In re: Montgomery v., 4th Cir. (2001)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from January 2001. It affirms a district court's denial of a petition for relief from a prefiling injunction that was properly imposed on Michael Wayne Montgomery. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so the Court dispensed with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    In Re: Montgomery V., 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from January 2001. It affirms a district court's denial of a petition for relief from a prefiling injunction that was properly imposed on Michael Wayne Montgomery. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so the Court dispensed with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7109

    In re: MICHAEL WAYNE MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka


    Macumba Zulu Z,
    Plaintiff - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (MISC-95-136-6)

    Submitted:

    January 11, 2001

    Decided:

    January 17, 2001

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Michael Wayne Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Wayne Montgomery appeals the district courts order
    denying his petition for relief from a properly imposed prefiling
    injunction.

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find no reversible error.


    the reasoning of the district court.
    95-136-6 (D.S.C. July 26, 2000).

    Accordingly, we affirm on

    In re: Montgomery, No. MISC-

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like