Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Woolfork v. Chesapeake Correctional Center, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is a 3 sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Larry Woolfork's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-09-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6877

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3 sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Larry Woolfork's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Woolfork v. Chesapeake Correctional Center, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Larry Woolfork's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6877

    LARRY WOOLFORK,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CHESAPEAKE CORRECTIONAL CENTER MEDICAL
    NEWHART, Sheriff; MS. BONNEY, Nurse,

    DEPARTMENT;

    JOHN

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Anthony John Trenga,
    District Judge. (1:09-cv-00273-AJT-TCB)

    Submitted:

    September 10, 2009

    Decided:

    September 15, 2009

    Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Larry Woolfork, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Larry

    Woolfork

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) action as frivolous.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Woolfork v. Chesapeake Corr. Ctr. Med. Dept, No. 1:09-

    cv-00273-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. Apr. 28, 2009).


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    We dispense with

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like