Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Stroupe v. Astrue, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    1) Edward Stroupe appealed a district court decision affirming the Social Security Commissioner's ruling that Stroupe was not entitled to supplemental security income. 2) The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. 3) The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons provided in that court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-12-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-1206

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Edward Stroupe appealed a district court decision affirming the Social Security Commissioner's ruling that Stroupe was not entitled to supplemental security income. 2) The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. 3) The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons provided in that court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Stroupe v. Astrue, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Edward Stroupe appealed a district court decision affirming the Social Security Commissioner's ruling that Stroupe was not entitled to supplemental security income. 2) The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. 3) The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons provided in that court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-1206

    EDWARD E. STROUPE, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Abingdon.
    James P. Jones, Chief
    District Judge. (1:07-cv-00090-jpj-pms)

    Submitted:

    November 24, 2009

    Decided:

    December 28, 2009

    Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Shawn C. Carver,
    Robert W. Kosman, Assistant Regional Counsel, Taryn F. Jasner,
    SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., appeals the district courts
    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    affirming

    the

    final

    decision

    of

    the

    Commissioner

    of

    Social

    Security that Stroupe was not entitled to supplemental security


    income.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    See Stroupe v. Astrue, No. 1:07-cv-00090-jpj-

    pms (W.D. Va. Feb. 9, 2009).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like