Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Cornelius Tucker, Jr. v. John H. Connell Francis E. Dail T. Woods J. Gregory Wallace, 16 F.3d 411, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Cornelius Tucker Jr. in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against several defendants. The appeals court found the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-02-10 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 16 F.3d 411 Docket: 93-7026

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Cornelius Tucker Jr. in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against several defendants. The appeals court found the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Cornelius Tucker, Jr. v. John H. Connell Francis E. Dail T. Woods J. Gregory Wallace, 16 F.3d 411, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Cornelius Tucker Jr. in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against several defendants. The appeals court found the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    16 F.

    3d 411
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Cornelius TUCKER, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,


    v.
    John H. CONNELL; Francis E. Dail; T. Woods; J. Gregory
    Wallace, Defendants Appellees.
    No. 93-7026.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Jan. 20, 1994.
    Decided Feb. 10, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-93405-CRT-BO)
    Cornelius Tucker, Jr., appellant pro se.
    E.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Connell, No. CA-93-405-CRT-BO
    (E.D.N.C. July 16, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like