Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Druitt v. William & Mary, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Anthony Druitt filed an employment discrimination action against the College of William and Mary and Williamsburg Area Transport Company that was dismissed by the district court. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal after reviewing the record and finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-08-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-1280

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Anthony Druitt filed an employment discrimination action against the College of William and Mary and Williamsburg Area Transport Company that was dismissed by the district court. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal after reviewing the record and finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Druitt v. William & Mary, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Anthony Druitt filed an employment discrimination action against the College of William and Mary and Williamsburg Area Transport Company that was dismissed by the district court. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal after reviewing the record and finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-1280

    ANTHONY D. DRUITT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY; WILLIAMSBURG
    AREA TRANSPORT COMPANY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News.
    Jerome B. Friedman,
    District Judge. (CA-04-128)

    Submitted:

    August 25, 2005

    Decided:

    August 30, 2005

    Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony D. Druitt, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah Love Feild, Assistant


    Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony D. Druitt appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his employment discrimination action.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Druitt v. The

    Coll. of William & Mary, No. CA-04-128 (E.D. Va. Feb. 23, 2005).
    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like