Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Boulware v. Laughrun, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to James Alvin Boulware on his complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) against private attorneys George V. Laughrun, II and Zoro J. Guice, Jr. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying Boulware's complaint. The appeals court denied Boulware's motion for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-07-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6860

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to James Alvin Boulware on his complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) against private attorneys George V. Laughrun, II and Zoro J. Guice, Jr. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying Boulware's complaint. The appeals court denied Boulware's motion for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Boulware v. Laughrun, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to James Alvin Boulware on his complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) against private attorneys George V. Laughrun, II and Zoro J. Guice, Jr. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying Boulware's complaint. The appeals court denied Boulware's motion for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6860

    JAMES ALVIN BOULWARE,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GEORGE V. LAUGHRUN, II, Private Attorney; ZORO
    J. GUICE, JR.,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-02-171-MU)

    Submitted:

    July 18, 2002

    Decided:

    July 25, 2002

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James Alvin Boulware, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    James

    Alvin

    Boulware

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his complaint brought under 42 U.S.C.A. 1983


    (West Supp. 2002) and 42 U.S.C. 1985(2) (1994).

    We have reviewed

    the record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    See Boulware v. Laughrun, No. CA-02-171-MU (W.D.N.C. filed

    May 15, 2002; entered Mary 16, 2002).

    We deny Boulwares motion

    for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary.

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like