Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views1 page
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from January 3, 1989. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Walter Thomas Hicks under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit found that Hicks' appeal was without merit based on its review of the record and district court opinion. It affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in that court's May 17, 1988 decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-01-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 865 F.2d 1258 Docket: 88-6058

    Original Title

    Walter Thomas Hicks v. Phillip Lacara, Attorney at Law Sid Bell, Prosecuting Attorney Stephens, Circuit Judge R.J. Allen, County Commissioner, 865 F.2d 1258, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from January 3, 1989. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Walter Thomas Hicks under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit found that Hicks' appeal was without merit based on its review of the record and district court opinion. It affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in that court's May 17, 1988 decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views1 page

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from January 3, 1989. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Walter Thomas Hicks under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit found that Hicks' appeal was without merit based on its review of the record and district court opinion. It affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in that court's May 17, 1988 decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    865 F.

    2d 1258
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Walter Thomas HICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Phillip LACARA, Attorney at Law; Sid Bell, Prosecuting
    Attorney; Stephens, Circuit Judge; R.J. Allen,
    County Commissioner, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 88-6058.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Oct. 26, 1988.
    Decided: Jan. 3, 1989.

    Walter Thomas Hicks, appellant pro se.


    Before SPROUSE, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Walter Thomas Hicks appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Hicks v. Lacara, C/A No. 1:88-667
    (S.D.W.Va. May 17, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like