Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • James S. Harris v. State of Maryland, William Schaefer, Governor, 875 F.2d 315, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    This document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1989. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to James S. Harris under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous ruling. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument since the dispositive issues had been recently decided by authoritative courts.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-06-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 875 F.2d 315 Docket: 88-7803

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1989. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to James S. Harris under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous ruling. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument since the dispositive issues had been recently decided by authoritative courts.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    James S. Harris v. State of Maryland, William Schaefer, Governor, 875 F.2d 315, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1989. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to James S. Harris under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous ruling. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument since the dispositive issues had been recently decided by authoritative courts.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    875 F.

    2d 315
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    James S. HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    STATE OF MARYLAND, William Schaefer, Governor,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 88-7803.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted March 24, 1989.
    Decided May 4, 1989.
    Rehearing Denied June 4, 1989.

    James S. Harris, appellant pro se.


    Before PHILLIPS, CHAPMAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    James S. Harris appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42
    U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Harris v. State of Maryland, C/A No. 88-2865-B
    (D.Md. Oct. 13, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive
    issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like