Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Thomas David Mathis v. Salem, Virginia Police Department, Sergeant Hess, Officer Harth, 888 F.2d 1386, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views1 page
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1989 involving Thomas David Mathis appealing a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against the Salem, Virginia Police Department, Sergeant Hess, and Officer Harth. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal without merit based on the reasoning provided in the lower court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit declined to hear oral arguments as the dispositive issues had already been authoritatively decided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-10-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 888 F.2d 1386 Docket: 89-6735

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1989 involving Thomas David Mathis appealing a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against the Salem, Virginia Police Department, Sergeant Hess, and Officer Harth. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal without merit based on the reasoning provided in the lower court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit declined to hear oral arguments as the dispositive issues had already been authoritatively decided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views1 page

    Thomas David Mathis v. Salem, Virginia Police Department, Sergeant Hess, Officer Harth, 888 F.2d 1386, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1989 involving Thomas David Mathis appealing a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against the Salem, Virginia Police Department, Sergeant Hess, and Officer Harth. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal without merit based on the reasoning provided in the lower court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit declined to hear oral arguments as the dispositive issues had already been authoritatively decided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    888 F.

    2d 1386
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Thomas David MATHIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    SALEM, VIRGINIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, Sergeant Hess,
    Officer
    Harth, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 89-6735.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Aug. 24, 1989.
    Decided Oct. 20, 1989.

    Thomas David Mathis, appellant pro se.


    James Walter Hopper, Parvin, Wilson, Barnett & Hopper, for appellees.
    Before DONALD RUSSELL, PHILLIPS, and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Thomas David Mathis appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Mathis v. Hess, C/A No. 88-403-R (W.D.Va.
    June 19, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues
    recently have been decided authoritatively.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like