Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Donald Cameron Frye v. C.A. Meares Hazel Keith, 891 F.2d 286, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Donald Cameron Frye appealed the district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Frye's appeal. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning as presented in case number 89-0218-C-M. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal arguments were already adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-11-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 891 F.2d 286 Docket: 89-7166

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Donald Cameron Frye appealed the district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Frye's appeal. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning as presented in case number 89-0218-C-M. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal arguments were already adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    Donald Cameron Frye v. C.A. Meares Hazel Keith, 891 F.2d 286, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Donald Cameron Frye appealed the district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Frye's appeal. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning as presented in case number 89-0218-C-M. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal arguments were already adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    891 F.

    2d 286

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Donald Cameron FRYE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    C.A. MEARES; Hazel Keith, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 89-7166.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Sept. 22, 1989.
    Decided: Nov. 14, 1989.

    Donald Cameron Frye, appellant pro se.


    Before WIDENER, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Donald Cameron Frye appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Frye v. Meares, C/A No. 89-0218-C-M
    (W.D.N.C., May 19, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like