Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Armondo Dominguez v. Kitty M. Hawk, 887 F.2d 1078, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    Armondo Dominguez appealed a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its prior opinion. The Fourth Circuit found oral argument was not necessary as the dispositive issues had been recently and authoritatively decided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-09-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 887 F.2d 1078 Docket: 89-7622

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Armondo Dominguez appealed a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its prior opinion. The Fourth Circuit found oral argument was not necessary as the dispositive issues had been recently and authoritatively decided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    Armondo Dominguez v. Kitty M. Hawk, 887 F.2d 1078, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Armondo Dominguez appealed a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its prior opinion. The Fourth Circuit found oral argument was not necessary as the dispositive issues had been recently and authoritatively decided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    887 F.

    2d 1078
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Armondo DOMINGUEZ, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    Kitty M. HAWK, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 89-7622.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Aug. 25, 1989.
    Decided: Sept. 26, 1989.

    Armondo Dominguez, appellant pro se.


    Before K.K. HALL, PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Armondo Dominguez appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Dominguez v. Hawk, C/A No. 89-207-HC-F
    (E.D.N.C. Apr. 26, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the
    dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like