Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ghulam Mohammed Nasim v. Patrick Whalen, Warden, 978 F.2d 1255, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992. Ghulam Mohammed Nasim appealed the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Nasim's appeal lacked merit. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-10-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 978 F.2d 1255 Docket: 92-6709

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992. Ghulam Mohammed Nasim appealed the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Nasim's appeal lacked merit. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Ghulam Mohammed Nasim v. Patrick Whalen, Warden, 978 F.2d 1255, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992. Ghulam Mohammed Nasim appealed the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Nasim's appeal lacked merit. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    978 F.

    2d 1255

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Ghulam Mohammed NASIM, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    Patrick WHALEN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 92-6709.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: September 28, 1992
    Decided: October 23, 1992

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore.
    Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, Appellant Pro Se.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Ghulam Mohammed Nasim appeals from the district court's order refusing
    habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2241 (1988). Our review of the
    record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nasim v. Whalen,
    No. CA-92-1136 (D. Md. June 16, 1992). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like