Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Nagy v. Clemenz, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Paul Nagy's Bivens complaint against prison officials. The three-judge panel found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-11-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6988

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Paul Nagy's Bivens complaint against prison officials. The three-judge panel found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Nagy v. Clemenz, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Paul Nagy's Bivens complaint against prison officials. The three-judge panel found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6988

    PAUL NAGY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MRS. CLEMENZ, ISM; SHEILA MATTINGLY, ISM;
    TERRY CAMPBELL, ISM; STEPHEN M. DEWALT,
    Warden,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-01-7)

    Submitted:

    October 18, 2002

    Decided:

    November 7, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Paul Nagy, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Paul Nagy appeals the district courts order denying relief on
    his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
    403 U.S. 388 (1971), complaint.
    find no reversible error.
    of the district court.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

    See Nagy v. Clemenz, No. CA-01-7 (E.D.N.C.

    filed May 30, 2002; entered May 31, 2002).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like