Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Dachman v. United States, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    S. Rebecca Dachman filed a civil action against the United States that was dismissed by the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. Dachman appealed the dismissal. In an unpublished opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-11-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-1833

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    S. Rebecca Dachman filed a civil action against the United States that was dismissed by the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. Dachman appealed the dismissal. In an unpublished opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Dachman v. United States, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    S. Rebecca Dachman filed a civil action against the United States that was dismissed by the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. Dachman appealed the dismissal. In an unpublished opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-1833

    S. REBECCA DACHMAN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA97-4352-PJM)

    Submitted:

    November 5, 1998

    Decided:

    November 18, 1998

    Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    S. Rebecca Dachman, Appellant Pro Se. George Levi Russell, III,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    S. Rebecca Dachman appeals the district courts order dismissing this civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district
    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dachman v. United
    States, No. CA-97-4352-PJM (D. Md. May 5, 1998). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like