Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • David Hoskins v. United States Congress, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed David Hoskins' appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), finding it frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and also found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons as the district court. The appeals court further denied Hoskins' motion for a transcript at government expense.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-06-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6573

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed David Hoskins' appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), finding it frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and also found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons as the district court. The appeals court further denied Hoskins' motion for a transcript at government expense.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    David Hoskins v. United States Congress, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed David Hoskins' appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), finding it frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and also found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons as the district court. The appeals court further denied Hoskins' motion for a transcript at government expense.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6573

    DAVID A. HOSKINS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES CONGRESS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;
    STATES SUPREME COURT; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

    UNITED

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:11-ct-03186-BO)

    Submitted:

    June 21, 2012

    Decided:

    June 26, 2012

    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    David A. Hoskins, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    David A. Hoskins appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous
    under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record

    and find that this appeal is frivolous.


    the

    appeal

    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    Accordingly, we dismiss
    by

    the

    district

    court.

    Hoskins v. United States Cong., No. 5:11-ct-03186-BO (E.D.N.C.


    Mar. 22, 2012).

    We further deny Hoskins motion for transcript

    at government expense.

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like