Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lourdes Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Lourdes Iglesias appealed the district court's denial of her motion to set aside a previous judgment for fraud on the court in her case against Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's order denying Iglesias' motion to set aside the judgment. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-10-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-1925

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lourdes Iglesias appealed the district court's denial of her motion to set aside a previous judgment for fraud on the court in her case against Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's order denying Iglesias' motion to set aside the judgment. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Lourdes Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lourdes Iglesias appealed the district court's denial of her motion to set aside a previous judgment for fraud on the court in her case against Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's order denying Iglesias' motion to set aside the judgment. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-1925

    LOURDES IGLESIAS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    WAL-MART STORES EAST L.P.,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Mark S. Davis, District
    Judge. (2:09-cv-00008-MSD-FBS)

    Submitted:

    October 17, 2013

    Decided: October 21, 2013

    Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lourdes Iglesias, Appellant Pro Se.


    Lindsey Hager McGinnis,
    LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lourdes

    Iglesias

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 motion to set aside judgment for


    fraud upon the court.
    reversible error.
    order.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm the district courts

    See Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East L.P., No. 2:09-cv-

    00008-MSD-FBS (E.D. Va. filed July 15, 2013; entered July 16,
    2013).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like