Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tommy Lee Null v. United States, 99 F.3d 1130, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Tommy Lee Null's Bivens complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The district court had adopted the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss the complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 99 F.3d 1130 Docket: 96-6874

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Tommy Lee Null's Bivens complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The district court had adopted the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss the complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views2 pages

    Tommy Lee Null v. United States, 99 F.3d 1130, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Tommy Lee Null's Bivens complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The district court had adopted the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss the complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    99 F.

    3d 1130

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Tommy Lee NULL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 96-6874.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Oct. 17, 1996.
    Decided Oct. 25, 1996.

    Tommy Lee Null, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United States
    Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order adopting the report and
    recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his Bivens* complaint
    under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act,
    Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and
    the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
    the on the reasoning of the district court. Null v. United States, No. CA-96-3766 (S.D.W.Va. May 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
    388 (1971)

    You might also like