Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Thompson v. Rogers, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Mason Thompson under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various prison officials. The district court had granted summary judgment to the defendants. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-05-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7470

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Mason Thompson under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various prison officials. The district court had granted summary judgment to the defendants. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Thompson v. Rogers, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Mason Thompson under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various prison officials. The district court had granted summary judgment to the defendants. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7470

    MASON THOMPSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WILLIAM P. ROGERS, Regional Director; ALTON
    BASKERVILLE, Warden of Powhatan Correctional
    Center; E. BARKSDALE, Major; A. NEITHERLAND,
    Captain; W. E. PENN, Lieutenant; SERGEANT LEE,
    first name unknown; C. W. JACKSON; B. RHOTON,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
    Judge. (CA-01-476-2)

    Submitted:

    April 18, 2003

    Decided:

    May 27, 2003

    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Mason Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Mason Thompson appeals the district courts order granting
    summary judgment to Defendants in this 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000)
    action.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court. See Thompson v. Rogers, No. CA-01-476-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 16,
    2002).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like